Psychiatrists and psychologists may scoff at the ideas presented in this book, but they
have no efficable or even consistent technology or methodology to apply to the problem of
sexual “deviance”. As a result, their patient’s problems persist; and rather than being
embarrassed by their incompetence, psychiatrists label their patient’s conditions
“intractable” and give them psychotropic medications which only suppress the symptoms,
and actually make their patient’s problems worse………… Since one is not “genetically
predisposed” to a sexual paraphilia, it logically (to psychologists) follows, that a
conclusion that these behaviors are “learned” in the course of one’s lifetime, is a very
reasonable explanation that fits the facts. It also follows with their demented logic,
that once such a behavior is “learned”, it cannot be “un-learned”, and it is therefore
intractable. Because essential data about how aberrations are formed is missing, such
reasoning is very seriously flawed………….. not to seem insensitive or sarcastic, but what
does psychiatry do with someone who “gets his rocks off” by petting a cat? Furthermore,
and not-for-nothing, how is such an aberration discovered if the cat can’t tell? Is the
cat offended? Does such a person turn himself in to a “shrink” one day, saying, “Look,
doc, I like to pet cats... I mean, I really dig my neighbor’s Siamese long-hair... I mean
I really like to pet cats – know what I mean? Know– whaddah mean, huh? – And if they start
purring, well, then I really bust a nut... Know what I mean, know-whaddah mean,
<nudge-nudge, wink, wink> huh?” ………….. However, the dime-store ice pick through the
eye socket up into the brainpan always seems to work. Ice picks thrust into the Analyzer
and thrashed about the “nucleus ventromedialis” (or whatever you wish to call it), is an
effective “cure” for paraphilias, or any aberrant behavior for that matter. Psychology has
an unwritten axiom: “Spare the ice pick and spoil the pervert”……….
The contamination of our youth in public schools with psychology, not only by what is
taught, but by the psychiatric experimentation that has been in the planning stages since
the 1970s:
“Schools will become clinics whose purpose is to provide individualized psycho-social
treatment for the student, and teachers must become psycho-social therapists. This will
include bio-chemical and psychological mediation of learning, as drugs are introduced
experimentally to improve in the learner such qualities as personality, concentration, and
memory. Children are to become the objects of experimentation.”
– NEA report on “Education in the ‘70’s”
Most analytic and nonanalytic students of human sexual aberration present life histories
including childhood sexual experiences as a more or less routine predictor. Non-analytic
examples of such studies include Krafft-Ebing, London (1937) Dicaprio (1955) Zeegers
(1966), Schaefer (1964); a more systematic and extensive one was offered by Gebhard et
al (1965). These anecdotes provide occasion for comparison as is concerned narrative use
with anecdotes from normative samples collected by, particularly, feminists and other
non-medical researchers (e.g, Kronhausen and Kronhausen, 1966)
“I can ... remember that up to the time I was eight or nine, I differentiated between
the sexes only according to the difference in clothing. In my mind it was only the
clothing that made the difference between boys and girls” (p289). “The beginning of my
transvestitism also occurred at this time [between fourteen and fifteen], and I
experienced my first orgasm in a suit belonging to my brother Edward. We had all put on
costumes for a ball, and when I looked at myself in the mirror, I found that I resembled
my father remarkably” (p305-6).
In traumatic situations, it is believed that fetishes may develop “in early childhood
and led to early sexual arousal” (Munroe and Gauvain, 2001 as read by Lowenstein, 2002).
Stoller reports another female case:
“I’ve experienced special feelings while dressed in Levis since I was very young -
possibly prior to attending school. I do remember feeling definitely sexually excited
around eleven years old, and being fully aware that my Levis were a contributing factor.
The neat part is that those same feelings are still available to me now, many years later.
It was during this time that I also discovered that wearing boots intensified those
feelings”.
It is a little-known fact that the incarceration rate of the United States is 6 to 19
times the rate of other Western European nations; one of the highest incarceration rates
in the world. Knowing this, one must necessarily ask, “Why, in the richest and most
prosperous nation on the planet, do we have such problems?” That analysis is complex, and
there is much to consider as “cause”; I would venture to say that perhaps something that
was never considered, is the core of the problem, and everything else we see is merely the
symptomology which creates an apparency of being “the cause”.
Since the problem seems to getting worse, it is amazing that some would call themselves
“experts” (in criminology, et al.), since all of their efforts (presumably) directed at
solving the problem, has only exacerbated it. Where the application of a science or a
technology fails to produce a result that is efficable and repeatable, one must question
the validity of the science, technology, or methodology.
“The workability of a postulate is established by the degree to which it explains
existing phenomena already known; by the degree that it predicts new phenomena which when
looked for, will be found to exist; and by the degree that it does not require that
phenomena which do not exist in fact, be called into existence for its explanation”.
– Scientology Logic #19
MORALS – Are a codified set of laws or rules of behavior, which are derived from the
collective ethics of individuals in the society. One might say that morality is an amalgam
of the ethics of the citizens of a particular country, or members of a society, tribe,
etc. Morals are usually codified laws upon which a society agrees, should be a standard
that all citizens abide by.
Often, there is disparity or antinomy between the two. One must come to terms with this
individual issue. In the past, the unifying force that sought to align ethics and morals
was the unattainable Biblical absolutes of divine law; our original Judeo-Christian values
that used to be the “moral compass” our nation was founded on.
A person in this state of what is known in “therapeutic” circles as “Toxic Shame” will
invariably develop a pathology; he becomes physically and / or emotionally ill. The
condition in the extreme is often fatal by his own hand. He is often “helped along” this
path to destruction by (psychiatric) “therapy”.
“Most clinicians know that outcome research on psychotherapy is flawed. People are never
really cured in any absolute or real sense”.
“Psychotherapy results are disappointing. Chronic trauma victims often remain stuck in
their patterns”.
Therefore we see that psychotherapy is not efficable in the empirical sense, by a leading
psychiatrist’s own admission. There is one more thing – one last thing that someone who
has offended does before he succumbs, and forever disappears into the rat hole he
inevitably stepped into; He attempts to be last-ditch right. He does this by asserting
that he is right, even when he is very wrong. He (for lack of a better analogy) attempts
to “prove” he is right in the face of his own consideration that his behavior was
out-ethics. He asserts his “rightness” by the only means at his disposal – he repeats the
behavior (commits another Overt, sin, or crime).
“I suspected something was wrong when my daughter stopped wanting to stay at home with
my fiancé when I had to go to work. I should have listened to my feelings and asked
questions, but I was too involved in my own life. I ignored her fears and I left her in
the hands of a child molester. I still wake up at night crying because I abandoned her and
didn’t protect her. I will live with that guilt the rest of my life.” - Mother of a
sexually abused child.
“My son was so outgoing. He liked basketball, camping, and he was always talking and
laughing. One day he stopped being that exuberant little boy. He became quiet and a loner.
I didn’t want to pressure him. I figured it was just a phase, so I didn’t ask questions. A
week later I found him dead in his room of an overdose. A note he left for me said, ‘I’m
sorry dad. I didn’t want to have sex with my baseball coach anymore, and I just can’t live
with my shame’.” - Father of a sexually abused child.
First, we must discard our previous paradigms. These have been imposed upon us (the
society-at-large) primarily by the psychologists, who are just as much in the dark, if not
more so than the average American. Since so much literature, money, time, and effort has
been devoted to attempting to understand this phenomena using the current nosology, there
is a natural reluctance to change the way we think about a problem even when actions taken
to solve the problem based on that thinking, yield little or no results. There is a true
axiom:
“Denial occurs when people have sacrificed so much, or have invested so much time,
energy, and money in a point of view, that they feel a need to see things not as they are,
but as they want them to be. The denial I speak of here is not a willful attempt to
deceive, but rather the inability to confront empirical fact, and scientific data that
challenges one’s entire belief system, or the validity of his or her hard-won education.
This inability to confront is related to a phenomenon known in Dianetics as ‘asserted
rightness’”. – Author
| 
